[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

[Rouslan Placella]

It *would* work, if we knew how many columns we are rendering before
rendering the header. However we don't know the number of columns until
the footer is rendered, which is too late...

On 14/03/12 23:42, Trinity wrote:
> Perhaps the yahoo YUI2 Grids *CSS* style sheets could be useful for doing a
> pure css multi column layout
> 
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM, cordiste <cordiste at free.fr> wrote:
> 
>> Anyway, Rouslan and Yoshinori you have made very nice design.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> 2012/3/14 cordiste <cordiste at free.fr>:
>>> About the logo: the typo is very nice but my wish would be to abandon
>>> the paper clip and paper because the logo as it stands is not easy to
>>> integrate into a theme.
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> P.S : See a screenshot for newpro's theme
>>> http://geeklog.fr/mediagallery/popup.php?s=20120314144340583
>>>
>>> 2012/3/14 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
>>>>>> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>>>>
>>>> The plan is to make it the default for Geeklog.net.  I am not sure
>> about the
>>>> actual install though since we have not discussed it yet. I personally
>> would
>>>> like to make it the default (though we would still include both themes
>> in
>>>> the install for now).
>>>>
>>>> For those of you who do not know, Rouslan is currently developing the
>> new
>>>> theme based on the look of the GL Version Test. You can see his
>> progress by
>>>> checking out the repository. The theme is currently called newpro.
>>>>
>>>> One question I have been meaning to ask as well is what shall we name
>> the
>>>> new theme?
>>>>
>>>>>> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>>>>
>>>> We modified the current logo (slightly) about a year ago. I personally
>> do
>>>> not see the need to do it again especially when we have other graphic
>> work
>>>> that needs to be designed and  created (icons for new Topics, graphics
>> for
>>>> the new front page) . The new theme is also based on the colour pallet
>> and
>>>> look of the current logo.
>>>>
>>>> If you have ideas though there is no harm in submitting them.
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>>>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste
>>>> Sent: March-14-12 8:50 AM
>>>> To: Geeklog Development
>>>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?
>>>>
>>>> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>>>>
>>>> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>> 2012/3/14 Dan Stoner <danstoner at gmail.com>:
>>>>> I like 2.0 due all these reasons that Tom mentioned.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Dan Stoner
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
>>>>>> So what is the verdict here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -          We do break compatibilities with some plugins
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -          A new Theme is being included
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -          Major new features (child topics, passwords, etc.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>>>>>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Vincent
>>>>>> Furia
>>>>>> Sent: March-05-12 2:34 PM
>>>>>> To: Geeklog Development
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just did a quick google search for "Geeklog 2.0" and "Geeklog 2"
>>>>>> and was surprised to see that both only had a few results that
>>>>>> included AptitudeCMS stuff. None of the links were likely to be
>>>>>> confusing. The first link for both searches were to the "Geeklog 2"
>>>>>> topic on geeklog.net. If we rename that topic as we planned, I don't
>>>> think the confusion would be that great.
>>>>>> We could make that change even more "concrete" by changing the topic
>> id.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In any case, if we ever want to do a major version bump we'll have to
>>>>>> deal with eventually. Also, we're now about two years since the last
>>>>>> active AptitudeCMS development...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Vinny
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trinity wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since
>>>>>>> it breaks compatibility with old plugins
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had the same thought, actually, but decided not to bring it up
>>>>>> myself because - I'm undecided. Jumping to 2.0 would make it clear
>>>>>> that incompatibilities are to be expected. Not sure how much
>>>>>> confusion this would cause, though, with all the high-flying plans
>>>>>> for the other Geeklog 2.0 which can still be found all over the place
>>>>>> (even though they are several years old by now). And I guess calling
>>>>>> it 3.0 would be a bit of a stretch
>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bye, Dirk
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>>>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>>>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>>>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>>>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel